Discussion 2: Capstone Forum:What Is the Strategy That Your Playbook Is Designed to Support?

Paper, Order, or Assignment Requirements

Now it is time to apply lessons learned from this week’s case analysis and discussion about strategy evaluation, this week’s readings, and other resources, to help you think about how you might answer the question, what is the strategy your playbook is designed to support and how will you evaluate it?
To prepare for this Discussion:
• Review all required readings, including the Weekly Briefing, which provides additional guidance on how to complete the Assignment.
• Review this week’s case study and peer discussion and reflect and make notes on the following: What insights did you gain, and what did you learn from this week’s resources your case analysis and peer discussion that you can apply to your Strategy Playbook for your chosen organization? What conceptual and strategic differences are important between the case example and your organization (focus on the concepts analyzed this week)? What assumptions do you need to make in order to use the strategy concepts appropriately?
• Identify and review all relevant readings from the MBA Capstone Program Bibliography. Given your chosen organization, what concepts, tools, and readings from the Program Capstone Bibliography are most relevant to helping guide how you might recommend improving the company? How and why are they relevant?
• Locate and maintain access to publicly available information about your organization.
Post a polished and synthesized entry into the discussion area, which will also be the basis for an entry into the final draft of your StrategyPlaybook for Extraordinary Results. Based on all of your previous week’s work on the playbook, and based on the strategy evaluation content from this week, at minimum you should add the following to your discussion post and Strategy Playbook:
o Explicitly identify and provide a name for the company-wide strategy you recommend for your company and then explain the essential components of the company-wide strategy you recommend for your company.
o Evaluate the company-wide strategy that you recommend for your company.

find the cost of your paper

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Discussion: Case Analysis With Discussion- Building the Living Organization and Executing Strategy in Real Time

Paper, Order, or Assignment Requirements

Perhaps the most important challenge any organization faces over time is executing strategy effectively, and making strategic thinking a part of everyone’s day-to-day life. All too often, strategy and strategic thinking is thought to be the exclusive domain of senior leadership (though they ARE the ones most responsible to see that there is a strategy!).
However, as you’ve seen through numerous readings in this course, and throughout your MBA program, the big-picture issues that strategy must deal with are just too voluminous, too complex, and too tied into the everyday work of everyone in the organization to leave it up to just a few people.
Keeping all the pieces of an organization aligned, keeping the people focused on the Soulful Purpose of the firm (and that includes the board of directors), is an ongoing and everyday activity. As Wolfe notes, “strategic planning is dead—long live strategy execution” (2001, p. 116).
This week you will explore strategy execution through an analysis of Mozilla Corporation, which is a for-profit entity that is part of the Mozilla Foundation (another hybrid organization like Google.org/Google, which you studied in Week 1).
To prepare for this Discussion:
• Review all required readings, including the Weekly Briefing, which provides additional guidance on how to complete the assignment.
• Review the case analysis. You may want to scan it multiple times.
• Identify and review all relevant readings from the MBA Capstone Program Bibliography.
Part A: Execution of Strategy at Mozilla

  1. How would you describe Mozilla’s cultural and organizational DNA? What, specifically, about the way Mozilla enacts strategy and executes its business plan provides it with such depth?
  2. What do you think are the lessons from Mozilla for other knowledge-based organizations, especially in terms of strategy execution and the involvement of people throughout the organization?
  3. In what ways is Mozilla more effective at executing strategy than Google.org (case from Week 1)? Why are they more effective?
  4. What are the critical challenges that Debbie Cohen faces as chief of people at Mozilla, specifically in terms of strategy execution and alignment? What should she do to meet these challenges, and why?
find the cost of your paper

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Discussion 6

Paper, Order, or Assignment Requirements

From the e-Activity, suggest two (2) actions that a person could take in order to be a team leader when the other team members are not his or her subordinates. Cite information from the video and / or the Website in order to support your response.
• Imagine that you are a new team leader. Suggest one (1) team-building activity that would allow you to learn about the different members of your team. Speculate on the primary manner in which your team-building activity will lead to enhanced teamwork between the members after they are back on the job.

find the cost of your paper

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Unit 4 Discussion Response- Consumers and Marketing

Paper, Order, or Assignment Requirements

Discussion Post 4: Consumers and Marketing
Go to https://www.outofservice.com/bigfive/ and take the personality assessment. Results are only as accurate as you are HONEST on your responses to the questions. Provide your SCORES and then discuss your results which are the traits that define you as a person. Do this in your own words and do not simply copy in your results from the assessment. How does each of these personality traits impact your consumer behavior? How might a marketer be able to use personality in targeting customers? Based on your personality traits and what you have learned about your personality, how would a marketer best target you?

find the cost of your paper

from your own site.

MGMT Of Production And Oprtns#5 Discussion

MGMT Of Production And Oprtns#5 Discussion
Write my research paperI need 250-300 words (1 page).The detailed instructions are in the attached file.I have also included a copy of the textbook, in case you need it. Chapters 11 and 12.APA STYLEORIGINAL WORK ONLYNO PLAGIARISM PLEASE.Purchase the answer to view it

Discussion Question- 2 Paragraphs APA

Our Products
Essays, Research Papers, Term Papers, Lab Reports, Movie Reviews, Annotated Bibliographies, Speeches/Presentations, Statistics Projects, Power Point Presentations, Dissertation Services, Theses, Research Proposals, Essay Editing, Proofreading, Essay Reviews, Editing, Article Reviews, Formatting, Personal Statements, Admission Essays, Scholarship Essays, Application Papers, and Admission Services.

Discussion – 400-600 Words With Atleast 2 References

Our Products
Essays, Research Papers, Term Papers, Lab Reports, Movie Reviews, Annotated Bibliographies, Speeches/Presentations, Statistics Projects, Power Point Presentations, Dissertation Services, Theses, Research Proposals, Essay Editing, Proofreading, Essay Reviews, Editing, Article Reviews, Formatting, Personal Statements, Admission Essays, Scholarship Essays, Application Papers, and Admission Services.

Week 1 Discussion – A+ Work Required – 14-16 Hours Max – Need Details Answers To Both Questions Separately

Week 1 Discussion – A+ Work Required – 14-16 Hours Max – Need Details Answers To Both Questions Separately
Write my research paperYou are to list 5 traits of a good safety leader which would make you want to follow them and create a work environment which is focused on safety as much as production and quality which 5 traits would they be? List the traits in order from most desirable to least desirable. (2). Be able to provide evidence (reasoning) as to WHY you chose these traits and WHY they would motivate you to want to follow the safety professional or frontline supervisor safety programming. Q2)Based on your research of the workplace safety incidents how would you rank (1-5) the following rationale for occupational safety and health in order of importance? Be able to defend your selections for rankings and thought process.Purchase the answer to view it

WHO CAN DO DISCUSSION POST IN 6 HOURS????

WHO CAN DO DISCUSSION POST IN 6 HOURS????
Write my research paperBUSINESS LAW : Billy ordered two rooms of furniture from Rooms-To-Go. Billy paid the full price of both rooms. When Rooms-To-Go delivered the furniture to Billy, he said that he could only take one room of the furniture and asked Rooms-To-Go to take the other room of furniture back to their warehouse until he could take that room of furniture. Rooms-To-Go agreed to do that and placed the other room of furniture that Billy ordered and paid for in its warehouse. While the furniture was in the Rooms-To-Go warehouse, it was destroyed by fire. Billy asked Rooms-To-Go to refund the money that he paid for the furniture that was destroyed by fire, but Rooms-To-Go refused, claiming that the risk of loss was on Billy since he was the owner of the furniture that was destroyed by fire.Does Rooms-To-Go owe Billy the money for the furniture destroyed by fire or is Billy out of luck?2. Little Big Corporation hired Stuart as a delivery driver. Before Stuart was hired, the personnel director of Big Little Corporation not only interviewed Stuart and asked him about his driving record and the status of his driver’s license, but the personnel director also obtained an official driving record for Stuart and talked with Stuart’s former employer specifically about Stuart’s driving record. There was no indication from the interview with Stuart, from his driving record, or from Stuart’s previous employer that Stuart was an unsafe driver.When Stuart was hired by Little Big Corporation, he was thoroughly trained in the operation of the delivery truck that he would be driving and provided an employee safety manual which he was required to (and did) read.For seven years, Stuart worked as a delivery driver for Little Big Corporation without any accidents or problems. In Stuart’s eighth year as a delivery driver for Little Big Corporation, while making a delivery, he was distracted by something in the cab of his delivery truck, ran a stop sign and hit the car that was being driven by Peggy. Peggy suffered a broken leg and her car was badly damaged.Peggy sued Stuart and Little Big Corporation for her injuries and damage, and she was awarded damages against Stuart and Little Big Corporation. Little Big Corporation was considered to be fully responsible for these damages under the doctrine of respondent superior. Is that fair to Little Big Corporation? What is accomplished by making an employer liable for the actions of their employees if the employer has done everything within reason to make sure that its employees are qualified and trained to do their jobs safely? Purchase the answer to view it